Cloud Security — most current exploitation doesn't touch a server room anymore.
62% of detections in cloud environments trace back to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation, not novel malware. SIRI's cloud security capability tests configuration, identity and access paths across AWS, Azure and GCP the way they're actually attacked.
The cloud didn't remove the perimeter — it moved it into configuration
A misconfigured storage bucket or an over-privileged role is now a more common way in than a novel exploit.
Most serious cloud incidents don't involve a zero-day. They involve a storage bucket left public, a role with broader permissions than its task requires, or a trust relationship between accounts that was never meant to allow the access it does. These aren't exotic findings — they're the kind of configuration drift that accumulates naturally as cloud environments scale and change.
62% of detections in cloud environments trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation — meaning the majority of what's actually being exploited is preventable, not novel. With over 90% of enterprises now running multi-cloud or hybrid environments, the number of configuration surfaces, cross-account trust relationships and identity permissions to review has grown well past what manual, periodic review can keep up with.
SIRI's cloud security testing maps configuration, identity permissions and cross-account trust relationships across AWS, Azure and GCP, and tests the actual attack paths an over-privileged role or misconfigured resource creates — feeding validated findings into SIRI Exposure for continuous tracking and SIRI MDR for cloud-specific detection.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave cloud misconfiguration unfound
Most cloud security gaps aren't exotic — they're configuration drift nobody reviewed since it was set up.
“Our cloud provider secures the environment”
Cloud providers secure the infrastructure; configuration, IAM and access-control decisions inside that infrastructure remain the customer's responsibility entirely.
“We reviewed our cloud config when we set it up”
Infrastructure-as-code, autoscaling and self-service provisioning mean configuration changes continuously — a review done at setup is stale within weeks.
“Our network security covers the cloud too”
Network-focused controls don't test IAM roles, cross-account trust relationships or storage-level permissions, which are where most cloud exploitation actually occurs.
“We're too small to be a cloud target”
Automated scanning for exposed cloud resources and misconfigurations targets by exposure, not organisation size — a public storage bucket is found the same way regardless of company size.
What SIRI's cloud security covers
Configuration, identity and attack paths across every major cloud
Tested the way real cloud exploitation happens, across AWS, Azure and GCP.
Cloud Configuration Assessment
Assessing configuration across compute, storage and networking for exploitable misconfiguration.
- Storage & compute review
- Network configuration testing
- Baseline drift detection
IAM & Privilege-Escalation Testing
Testing identity and access management for privilege-escalation and lateral-movement paths.
- Role & permission review
- Privilege-escalation path testing
- Cross-account trust review
Multi-Cloud & Hybrid Coverage
Coverage across AWS, Azure, GCP and hybrid on-premises/cloud environments.
- AWS, Azure & GCP coverage
- Hybrid environment testing
- Consistent cross-cloud methodology
SaaS & Cloud-to-Cloud Security
Assessing the SaaS-to-SaaS and cloud-to-cloud connections most inventories miss.
- SaaS connection mapping
- OAuth & integration review
- Shadow-SaaS discovery
Cloud-Specific Detection
Detection tuned specifically to cloud and IAM attack patterns, not generic network rules.
- Cloud-native detection rules
- IAM anomaly detection
- Feeds SIRI MDR
Cloud Security Governance
Governance and policy so secure configuration is maintained, not just assessed once.
- Policy-as-code guidance
- Guardrail design
- Continuous compliance mapping
Evidence, not guesswork
No cloud security review vs. provider-default settings vs. SIRI Cloud Security — what actually differs
Default cloud settings and a tested security posture are different things.
| Approach | No dedicated cloud review | Provider-default settings only | SIRI Cloud Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration assessment cadence | None | Set once, rarely revisited | Continuous |
| IAM & privilege-escalation testing | No | Rare | Included |
| Multi-cloud & hybrid coverage | No | Depends on provider | Included |
| Cross-account trust relationship review | No | Rare | Included |
| Cloud-specific detection coverage | No | Basic provider alerts only | Tuned via SIRI MDR |
Sources: DSCI cloud-detection data; 2026 multi-cloud enterprise adoption benchmarks. Summarised for comparison.
Numbers every board should know
What's actually driving cloud risk
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — not novel exploits.
Run multi-cloud
Of enterprises now operate multi-cloud or hybrid-cloud environments.
Involve third parties
Of breaches involve a supplier or third party — SaaS and cloud integrations included.
Rate of config change
Infrastructure-as-code and autoscaling mean review can't be a one-time event.
Compliance alignment
Standards & frameworks we align to
Our methodology is built around publicly recognised frameworks — not a proprietary checklist. Where a specific certification or attestation is completed and verified, it will be named here explicitly.
Framework references reflect publicly available versions as of publication and describe the standards our methodology is aligned to; they are not a claim of certification, attestation, or audit completion unless stated explicitly elsewhere on this site.
Why SIRI for cloud security specifically
Testing built for where the exploitation actually happens now
Cloud-native risk needs cloud-native testing, not network security applied to a different environment.
Cloud-aware by default
Testing is built around IAM, configuration and cross-account trust — the categories where cloud exploitation actually concentrates.
Multi-cloud & hybrid coverage
AWS, Azure, GCP and hybrid environments are covered under one consistent methodology, not siloed per platform.
Validated attack paths
Findings are tested as real privilege-escalation and lateral-movement paths, not just a list of misconfiguration flags.
Connected to detection
Validated findings feed directly into SIRI MDR's cloud-specific detection tuning and SIRI Exposure's continuous tracking.
Who this is built for
Organisations SIRI's cloud security is built for
How we work
From configuration review to continuous detection
Configuration Assessment
Reviewing configuration, IAM and cross-account trust across your cloud footprint.
Weeks 1–2Attack-Path Testing
Testing privilege-escalation and lateral-movement paths through offensive testing.
Week 3Harden & Remediate
Prioritised remediation guidance and policy-as-code recommendations.
Week 4Continuous Monitoring
Ongoing cloud-specific detection tuning and configuration-drift tracking.
OngoingFrequently asked
Cloud security, answered directly
Do you cover AWS, Azure and GCP, or just one?
All three, plus hybrid on-premises/cloud environments, under one consistent testing methodology so results are comparable across platforms.
Isn't this the cloud provider's responsibility?
Cloud providers secure the underlying infrastructure under the shared-responsibility model; configuration, identity and access decisions inside your environment remain your responsibility, and that's what this testing covers.
How is this different from a standard penetration test?
It's cloud-specific: IAM roles, cross-account trust relationships, storage permissions and cloud-native services, which conventional network-focused testing typically doesn't cover in depth.
Can you assess our environment without disrupting production?
Yes — cloud configuration and IAM review is largely non-disruptive; any active exploitation testing of identified paths is scoped and agreed with you in advance.
Do you help implement the fixes, or just report findings?
Both, as scoped — findings come with prioritised, practical remediation guidance, and policy-as-code or guardrail implementation support is available where needed.
Find out what's actually reachable in your cloud
Test your cloud configuration the way it's actually attacked.
Start with a configuration assessment, or move straight to attack-path testing if you already know your footprint.
Related