Application Security — the software you ship is the attack surface you actually own.

Most exploitable vulnerabilities aren't zero-days — they're known and unpatched

The gap isn't discovering vulnerabilities. It's the 278 days between a fix existing and it being applied.

Application security is often framed around finding novel flaws, but the more common failure mode is simpler: a known, patchable vulnerability that was never remediated, in a dependency nobody's actively maintaining, buried under enough scanner noise that nobody prioritised it. Testing has to account for that reality, not just add another scan to a pile of unactioned alerts.

87% of organisations run at least one service with a known, exploitable vulnerability already deployed. That's not a testing-coverage problem — it's a triage and remediation problem, compounded by a median dependency lag of 278 days and a scanner alert volume where only 18% of “critical” findings hold up once runtime context is actually applied. Effective application security has to cut through that noise to what's genuinely exploitable in your specific environment.

SIRI's application security testing combines manual, business-logic-aware testing against the OWASP Top 10 with dependency and supply-chain review, prioritising findings by what's actually exploitable in context — not scanner severity alone — and feeding validated critical findings directly into SIRI Attack for full exploitation testing.