AI Maturity Assessment — Know how mature your AI governance actually is
SIRI Security assesses your organisation's AI governance maturity — from model risk management to deployment oversight — and builds a roadmap aligned to where AI regulation is heading.
Governance the board can actually act on
What is an AI Maturity Assessment?
As organisations adopt AI faster than governance typically catches up, an AI maturity assessment benchmarks how well you currently manage AI-specific risk: model risk assessment, data governance for training and inference, human oversight of AI decisions, and incident response for AI-specific failure modes.
We assess maturity across your actual AI use cases — whether that's a handful of internal tools or AI embedded directly in your product — and build a roadmap that anticipates where regulation (including ISO 42001 and emerging AI-specific laws) is heading, not just where it stands today.
SIRI Security delivers AI Maturity Assessment to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave governance underdeveloped
Governance gaps rarely show up until a board is asked a direct question it can't answer.
“IT owns cyber risk, not the board”
RBI's 2026 Framework and SEBI's CSCRF both expect board-level oversight of cyber resilience directly, not a delegated report nobody reads.
“We feel reasonably mature”
Maturity assessed informally rarely survives a structured review — a scored assessment is what turns a feeling into a defensible position.
“Our BCP/DR plan exists, so we're covered”
An untested BCP/DR plan is a document, not a capability — governance work exists to confirm it actually holds up under a real scenario.
“Our data governance policy covers our DPDPA obligations”
A policy alone doesn't demonstrate the data mapping, retention discipline, and access governance DPDPA increasingly expects to see evidenced.
What AI Maturity Assessment covers
What's included, start to finish
A structured programme the board can actually engage with, not a technical report handed up unread.
AI use-case inventory
A clear picture of where and how AI is actually being used across your organisation.
Governance maturity scoring
Assessed across model risk, data governance, oversight, and incident response.
Regulatory horizon-scanning
Positioning your programme ahead of emerging AI-specific regulatory requirements.
Prioritised roadmap
What to build next, ranked by risk and regulatory exposure.
ISO 42001 alignment
A clear line from this assessment into formal ISO 42001 certification if you choose to pursue it.
Evidence, not guesswork
No formal governance vs. informal effort vs. a SIRI-supported programme
The gap surfaces exactly when a board or regulator asks for a substantive answer.
| Approach | No formal programme | Informal / ad hoc | SIRI AI Maturity Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board-level reporting | None | Occasional | Structured, recurring |
| Scored maturity baseline | No | No | Included |
| BCP/DR testing | No | Rare | Scheduled |
| Regulatory alignment (RBI/SEBI) | No | Assumed | Assessed directly |
| Roadmap with prioritisation | No | Informal | Included |
Sources: RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; SEBI Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF); Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023; DSCI cloud detection data. Summarised for comparison.
Numbers every board should know
What governance work is actually protecting against
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — a posture and governance gap as much as a technical one.
CERT-In notification window
Depends on governance structures already being in place before an incident starts the clock.
Incidents CERT-In handled
In the latest reporting year — the scale governance programmes are measured against.
Of malware detections
Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).
Why SIRI for AI Maturity Assessment specifically
Governance built by the team that also answers to regulators
The same practice that builds your governance layer files your regulatory filings when a real incident tests it.
Programmes built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead
Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.
Financial-sector governance covered directly
Deepa Menon, Senior Associate, advises banks, NBFCs, and payment aggregators directly on RBI licensing, SEBI CSCRF, and financial-sector cyber resilience.
Findings connected directly to legal exposure
SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.
Technical maturity verified, not self-reported
Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.
Who this is built for
Organisations this governance service is built for
How we work
From scoping to ongoing delivery
Current-State Assessment
We assess where you stand today against the specific outcome this service is meant to achieve.
Week 1Programme Design
We design the specific programme, policy, or plan your organisation needs, sized appropriately for you.
Weeks 2–3Implementation Support
We help implement alongside your team so the programme survives and runs after we leave.
Week 4+Review & Continuous Improvement
A review cadence keeps it current as your organisation and risk landscape change.
OngoingFrequently asked
AI Maturity Assessment, answered directly
Do you assess AI we've built ourselves, or vendor AI, or both?
Both — internally built models and third-party AI services you've integrated are both in scope for the governance assessment.
Does this include technical testing of our AI systems?
This assessment focuses on governance maturity; technical testing is covered separately under our AI/LLM Security Audit service.
How long does this take?
Most engagements in this category run 3 to 8 weeks depending on organisational size and current maturity.
Who runs this day to day?
A senior SIRI Security governance consultant leads the engagement, coordinating with SIRI Law LLP wherever legal or regulatory interpretation is needed.
Give the board a real answer
Scope AI Maturity Assessment.
Most engagements start with a scored baseline assessment before recommending a governance roadmap.
Related