Application Security Governance — Structured oversight across your entire application portfolio
SIRI Security designs Application Security Governance frameworks that give you structured, consistent oversight of security posture across your entire application portfolio, not just whichever app was tested most recently.
A security baseline the whole organisation actually follows
What does Application Security Governance involve?
Organisations running dozens or hundreds of applications often have inconsistent security oversight — some apps tested rigorously, others never assessed at all, with no consistent standard applied across the portfolio.
We design a governance framework that defines security standards applicable across all applications, a risk-based testing cadence, ownership and accountability structures, and portfolio-level reporting for leadership.
SIRI Security delivers Application Security Governance to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave application strategy underdeveloped
Strategic AppSec gaps rarely show up in a single release — they compound quietly across many.
“We'll add security once the product is stable”
Retrofitting security into an established SDLC costs materially more than building a minimum baseline in from the start.
“Annual review is frequent enough”
A quarterly AppSec review catches drift a single annual pass consistently misses — architectures and dependencies change faster than yearly cycles account for.
“Our core app is covered, so we're fine”
Browser extensions, third-party integrations, and infrastructure components carry their own attack surface that a core-app-only review skips entirely.
“We don't need a formal security score”
An internal benchmark like a structured security score gives the board a trackable number — without one, 'more secure' has no defensible baseline to measure against.
What Application Security Governance covers
What's included, start to finish
Strategy and governance that gets built into how you ship, not reviewed after the fact.
Portfolio risk classification
Applications classified by risk to prioritise governance attention appropriately.
Security standards definition
A consistent baseline security standard applied across the application portfolio.
Testing cadence framework
Risk-based testing frequency rather than ad hoc or inconsistent scheduling.
Ownership & accountability model
Clear accountability for security posture at the application-owner level.
Portfolio-level reporting
Leadership-level visibility into security posture across the whole portfolio, not single apps.
Evidence, not guesswork
No formal AppSec strategy vs. ad hoc reviews vs. a SIRI-supported programme
The gap compounds quietly across releases until an audit or incident makes it visible all at once.
| Approach | No formal strategy | Ad hoc reviews | SIRI Application Security Governance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security baseline defined | No | Informal | Documented, enforced |
| Review cadence | None | Irregular | Quarterly or as scoped |
| Third-party/extension coverage | No | Rare | Included |
| Trackable security score | No | No | Included |
| SDLC integration | No | Partial | Built in |
Sources: OWASP Top 10 and OWASP ASVS; DSCI cloud detection data; RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; Seqrite 2026 threat report. Summarised for comparison.
Numbers every board should know
What strategic AppSec work is actually protecting against
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI).
Of malware detections
Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).
Incidents CERT-In handled
In the latest reporting year — the backdrop strategic security investment is measured against.
CERT-In notification window
The deadline a defined security baseline helps make achievable.
Why SIRI for Application Security Governance specifically
Strategy set by the same team that tests it
The practitioners who define your security baseline are the same ones who test whether it actually holds.
Led directly by SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity
Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.
Findings connected directly to legal exposure
SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.
Governance built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead
Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.
Built for RBI's specific application-security expectations
Baselines and review cadence are scoped to the standard RBI's 2026 Framework and SEBI's CSCRF expect, not a generic industry template.
Who this is built for
Organisations this strategic service is built for
How we work
From scoping to ongoing delivery
Current State Review
We review your current program, policies, and practices to establish an honest baseline.
Week 1Framework & Roadmap Design
We design the specific framework, policy, or roadmap tailored to your organisation's scale and risk profile.
Weeks 2–3Implementation Support
We support rollout and adoption, working alongside your team rather than handing over a document and leaving.
Week 4+Ongoing Governance
We help establish the ongoing governance and review cadence so the program stays current as your organisation evolves.
OngoingFrequently asked
Application Security Governance, answered directly
How large does our application portfolio need to be for this to make sense?
This is most valuable once you have more than a handful of applications where inconsistent oversight has become a genuine risk — commonly 15 or more.
Does this replace individual VAPT engagements?
No — it's the governance layer that decides when, how often, and to what standard those individual assessments happen across your portfolio.
How long does this engagement take?
Typically 4 to 8 weeks depending on organisational scale and how much existing documentation there is to build from.
Do you help maintain this after the initial engagement?
Yes — we offer ongoing advisory and review services to keep the program current as your organisation and its risk profile evolve.
Build the baseline, then hold it
Scope Application Security Governance.
Most engagements start with a current-state review before defining the baseline and review cadence.
Related