SIRI Security — Exact Header + WhatsApp Widget (verbatim extract)
Application Security Governance | Strategic Services — SIRI Security
Strategic Services › Application Security Governance

Application Security Governance — Structured oversight across your entire application portfolio

SIRI Security designs Application Security Governance frameworks that give you structured, consistent oversight of security posture across your entire application portfolio, not just whichever app was tested most recently.

62%Of cloud detections
70%Of malware detections
29.44LIncidents CERT-In handled
Why application-layer strategy is now board business
Live tracking · scroll to see every relevant change
Named standard
OWASP TOP 10
Application security governance and SDLC work is scoped against the current OWASP Top 10 and OWASP ASVS as the reference baseline.
Growing gap
62% CLOUD
Cloud misconfiguration and IAM exploitation account for 62% of detections in cloud environments (DSCI) — a growing share of what strategic AppSec work has to account for.
Effective
31 JUL 2026
RBI's 2026 Framework expects demonstrable application security governance, not testing bolted on at the end of a release cycle.
Baseline
70% MALWARE
Trojans and file infectors make up 70% of malware detections (Seqrite 2026) — relevant context for infra and integration threat analysis.
Baseline
6 HR WINDOW
CERT-In's notification window makes a defined security baseline and threat analysis a precondition for a fast, confident response.

A security baseline the whole organisation actually follows

What does Application Security Governance involve?

Organisations running dozens or hundreds of applications often have inconsistent security oversight — some apps tested rigorously, others never assessed at all, with no consistent standard applied across the portfolio.

We design a governance framework that defines security standards applicable across all applications, a risk-based testing cadence, ownership and accountability structures, and portfolio-level reporting for leadership.

Security built into the SDLC beats security bolted onto it
62% of cloud detections trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — a category strategic, governance-level AppSec work is designed to close earlier, before release, rather than after.

SIRI Security delivers Application Security Governance to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.

What organisations get wrong

Four assumptions that leave application strategy underdeveloped

Strategic AppSec gaps rarely show up in a single release — they compound quietly across many.

01 — TIMING

“We'll add security once the product is stable”

Retrofitting security into an established SDLC costs materially more than building a minimum baseline in from the start.

02 — CADENCE

“Annual review is frequent enough”

A quarterly AppSec review catches drift a single annual pass consistently misses — architectures and dependencies change faster than yearly cycles account for.

03 — SCOPE

“Our core app is covered, so we're fine”

Browser extensions, third-party integrations, and infrastructure components carry their own attack surface that a core-app-only review skips entirely.

04 — MEASUREMENT

“We don't need a formal security score”

An internal benchmark like a structured security score gives the board a trackable number — without one, 'more secure' has no defensible baseline to measure against.

What Application Security Governance covers

What's included, start to finish

Strategy and governance that gets built into how you ship, not reviewed after the fact.

01

Portfolio risk classification

Applications classified by risk to prioritise governance attention appropriately.

    See Quarterly AppSec Review →
    02

    Security standards definition

    A consistent baseline security standard applied across the application portfolio.

      See Minimum Security Baseline →
      03

      Testing cadence framework

      Risk-based testing frequency rather than ad hoc or inconsistent scheduling.

        See Secure SDLC →
        04

        Ownership & accountability model

        Clear accountability for security posture at the application-owner level.

          See Quarterly AppSec Review →
          05

          Portfolio-level reporting

          Leadership-level visibility into security posture across the whole portfolio, not single apps.

            See Minimum Security Baseline →

            Evidence, not guesswork

            No formal AppSec strategy vs. ad hoc reviews vs. a SIRI-supported programme

            The gap compounds quietly across releases until an audit or incident makes it visible all at once.

            ApproachNo formal strategyAd hoc reviewsSIRI Application Security Governance
            Security baseline definedNoInformalDocumented, enforced
            Review cadenceNoneIrregularQuarterly or as scoped
            Third-party/extension coverageNoRareIncluded
            Trackable security scoreNoNoIncluded
            SDLC integrationNoPartialBuilt in

            Sources: OWASP Top 10 and OWASP ASVS; DSCI cloud detection data; RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; Seqrite 2026 threat report. Summarised for comparison.

            Numbers every board should know

            What strategic AppSec work is actually protecting against

            62%

            Of cloud detections

            Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI).

            70%

            Of malware detections

            Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).

            29.44L

            Incidents CERT-In handled

            In the latest reporting year — the backdrop strategic security investment is measured against.

            6 HR

            CERT-In notification window

            The deadline a defined security baseline helps make achievable.

            Why SIRI for Application Security Governance specifically

            Strategy set by the same team that tests it

            The practitioners who define your security baseline are the same ones who test whether it actually holds.

            01

            Led directly by SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity

            Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.

            02

            Findings connected directly to legal exposure

            SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.

            03

            Governance built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead

            Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.

            04

            Built for RBI's specific application-security expectations

            Baselines and review cadence are scoped to the standard RBI's 2026 Framework and SEBI's CSCRF expect, not a generic industry template.

            Who this is built for

            Organisations this strategic service is built for

            Banks, NBFCs & insurers Scaling engineering teams SaaS companies shipping continuously Organisations integrating third-party extensions Boards wanting a trackable security score

            How we work

            From scoping to ongoing delivery

            01

            Current State Review

            We review your current program, policies, and practices to establish an honest baseline.

            Week 1
            02

            Framework & Roadmap Design

            We design the specific framework, policy, or roadmap tailored to your organisation's scale and risk profile.

            Weeks 2–3
            03

            Implementation Support

            We support rollout and adoption, working alongside your team rather than handing over a document and leaving.

            Week 4+
            04

            Ongoing Governance

            We help establish the ongoing governance and review cadence so the program stays current as your organisation evolves.

            Ongoing

            Frequently asked

            Application Security Governance, answered directly

            How large does our application portfolio need to be for this to make sense?

            This is most valuable once you have more than a handful of applications where inconsistent oversight has become a genuine risk — commonly 15 or more.

            Does this replace individual VAPT engagements?

            No — it's the governance layer that decides when, how often, and to what standard those individual assessments happen across your portfolio.

            How long does this engagement take?

            Typically 4 to 8 weeks depending on organisational scale and how much existing documentation there is to build from.

            Do you help maintain this after the initial engagement?

            Yes — we offer ongoing advisory and review services to keep the program current as your organisation and its risk profile evolve.

            Build the baseline, then hold it

            Scope Application Security Governance.

            Most engagements start with a current-state review before defining the baseline and review cadence.

            Talk to SIRI Security: +91 79819 12046

            Visit or contact us

            SIRI Security — Hyderabad, India

            OfficeHITEC City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081, India
            Telephone+91 79819 12046
            Emailcontact@sirisecurity.com
            Other officesNew Delhi, India · Austin, Texas, USA · Online worldwide
            HoursMon–Sat, 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM IST · Emergency line 24/7
            Scroll to Top