Strategic Services › Integration Threat Analysis
Integration Threat Analysis — Assess the risk introduced at the seams, before you connect two systems
SIRI Security's Integration Threat Analysis assesses the security risk introduced whenever systems, vendors, or platforms are integrated — the connection points that are frequently under-scrutinised compared to the systems on either side.
62%Of cloud detections
70%Of malware detections
29.44LIncidents CERT-In handled
Why application-layer strategy is now board business
Live tracking · scroll to see every relevant change
Named standard
OWASP TOP 10
Application security governance and SDLC work is scoped against the current OWASP Top 10 and OWASP ASVS as the reference baseline.
Growing gap
62% CLOUD
Cloud misconfiguration and IAM exploitation account for 62% of detections in cloud environments (DSCI) — a growing share of what strategic AppSec work has to account for.
Effective
31 JUL 2026
RBI's 2026 Framework expects demonstrable application security governance, not testing bolted on at the end of a release cycle.
Baseline
70% MALWARE
Trojans and file infectors make up 70% of malware detections (Seqrite 2026) — relevant context for infra and integration threat analysis.
Baseline
6 HR WINDOW
CERT-In's notification window makes a defined security baseline and threat analysis a precondition for a fast, confident response.
A security baseline the whole organisation actually follows
What does Integration Threat Analysis involve?
Individual systems are often well-assessed on their own, but the integration between them — APIs, data pipelines, shared authentication, third-party connections — introduces new risk that's easy to overlook because it belongs to neither system's owner alone.
We analyse the specific integration architecture, identify risks introduced by the connection itself (authentication trust, data exposure, dependency risk), and recommend controls appropriate to the sensitivity of what's being connected.
Security built into the SDLC beats security bolted onto it
62% of cloud detections trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — a category strategic, governance-level AppSec work is designed to close earlier, before release, rather than after.
SIRI Security delivers Integration Threat Analysis to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave application strategy underdeveloped
Strategic AppSec gaps rarely show up in a single release — they compound quietly across many.
01 — TIMING
“We'll add security once the product is stable”
Retrofitting security into an established SDLC costs materially more than building a minimum baseline in from the start.
02 — CADENCE
“Annual review is frequent enough”
A quarterly AppSec review catches drift a single annual pass consistently misses — architectures and dependencies change faster than yearly cycles account for.
03 — SCOPE
“Our core app is covered, so we're fine”
Browser extensions, third-party integrations, and infrastructure components carry their own attack surface that a core-app-only review skips entirely.
04 — MEASUREMENT
“We don't need a formal security score”
An internal benchmark like a structured security score gives the board a trackable number — without one, 'more secure' has no defensible baseline to measure against.
What Integration Threat Analysis covers
What's included, start to finish
Strategy and governance that gets built into how you ship, not reviewed after the fact.
01
Integration architecture review
A clear picture of how systems actually connect and trust each other.
02
Trust boundary analysis
Identifying where trust is being extended further than intended.
03
Data exposure assessment
What data actually flows across the integration, and its sensitivity.
04
Dependency risk evaluation
Risk introduced by relying on the integrated system's own security posture.
05
Control recommendations
Practical controls scoped to the specific integration's risk level.
Evidence, not guesswork
No formal AppSec strategy vs. ad hoc reviews vs. a SIRI-supported programme
The gap compounds quietly across releases until an audit or incident makes it visible all at once.
| Approach | No formal strategy | Ad hoc reviews | SIRI Integration Threat Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security baseline defined | No | Informal | Documented, enforced |
| Review cadence | None | Irregular | Quarterly or as scoped |
| Third-party/extension coverage | No | Rare | Included |
| Trackable security score | No | No | Included |
| SDLC integration | No | Partial | Built in |
Sources: OWASP Top 10 and OWASP ASVS; DSCI cloud detection data; RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; Seqrite 2026 threat report. Summarised for comparison.
Numbers every board should know
What strategic AppSec work is actually protecting against
62%
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI).
70%
Of malware detections
Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).
29.44L
Incidents CERT-In handled
In the latest reporting year — the backdrop strategic security investment is measured against.
6 HR
CERT-In notification window
The deadline a defined security baseline helps make achievable.
Why SIRI for Integration Threat Analysis specifically
Strategy set by the same team that tests it
The practitioners who define your security baseline are the same ones who test whether it actually holds.
01
Led directly by SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity
Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.
02
Findings connected directly to legal exposure
SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.
03
Governance built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead
Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.
04
Built for RBI's specific application-security expectations
Baselines and review cadence are scoped to the standard RBI's 2026 Framework and SEBI's CSCRF expect, not a generic industry template.
Who this is built for
Organisations this strategic service is built for
Banks, NBFCs & insurers
Scaling engineering teams
SaaS companies shipping continuously
Organisations integrating third-party extensions
Boards wanting a trackable security score
How we work
From scoping to ongoing delivery
01
Current State Review
We review your current program, policies, and practices to establish an honest baseline.
Week 102
Framework & Roadmap Design
We design the specific framework, policy, or roadmap tailored to your organisation's scale and risk profile.
Weeks 2–303
Implementation Support
We support rollout and adoption, working alongside your team rather than handing over a document and leaving.
Week 4+04
Ongoing Governance
We help establish the ongoing governance and review cadence so the program stays current as your organisation evolves.
OngoingFrequently asked
Integration Threat Analysis, answered directly
Is this relevant for M&A or vendor onboarding specifically?
Yes — this analysis is especially valuable during M&A system integration, new vendor onboarding, or any project connecting previously separate systems.
Do you assess third-party systems we don't control directly?
We assess the integration point and what it exposes; deeper assessment of a third party's own systems typically falls under our Third-Party Risk (TPRM) service.
How long does this engagement take?
Typically 4 to 8 weeks depending on organisational scale and how much existing documentation there is to build from.
Do you help maintain this after the initial engagement?
Yes — we offer ongoing advisory and review services to keep the program current as your organisation and its risk profile evolve.
Build the baseline, then hold it
Scope Integration Threat Analysis.
Most engagements start with a current-state review before defining the baseline and review cadence.
Talk to SIRI Security: +91 79819 12046
Related