SIRI Security — Exact Header + WhatsApp Widget (verbatim extract)
National Security Compliance | GRC Services — SIRI Security
GRC Services › National Security Compliance

National Security Compliance — For organisations in nationally sensitive sectors

SIRI Security advises critical infrastructure and nationally sensitive organisations on the specific security compliance obligations that apply beyond standard commercial frameworks.

62%Of cloud detections
6 HRCERT-In notification window
29.44LIncidents CERT-In handled
Why GRC is now a named line item for boards
Live tracking · scroll to see every relevant change
Effective
31 JUL 2026
RBI's 2026 Framework expects a structured risk-management approach, not point-in-time compliance checks — the core discipline GRC services are built to operationalise.
Named requirement
SEBI CSCRF
SEBI's framework layers its own risk and reporting obligations on regulated intermediaries, on top of general GRC practice.
Named requirement
DPDPA
India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act expects demonstrable data-risk governance, including third-party and vendor risk.
Baseline
6 HR WINDOW
CERT-In's notification requirement makes risk visibility a precondition, not an afterthought, for meeting the deadline.
Underwriting standard
CYBER INSURANCE
Cyber insurers increasingly verify represented controls before binding or renewing cover — a gap between claimed and actual posture directly affects a claim.

Risk management the board can act on, not a spreadsheet nobody updates

What does National Security Compliance advisory involve?

Organisations in critical infrastructure, defence-adjacent, or other nationally sensitive sectors face compliance obligations beyond standard commercial frameworks — sector-specific directives, data localisation requirements, and heightened incident reporting expectations.

We assess exactly which obligations apply to your specific sector and activities, and build a compliance programme around them, coordinating with SIRI Law LLP's defence and government advisory practice where legal interpretation is needed.

Third-party risk is often the largest unmanaged exposure
Vendor and third-party relationships routinely carry as much data and system access as internal teams — without a formal TPRM programme, that risk is invisible until it becomes an incident.

SIRI Security delivers National Security Compliance to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.

What organisations get wrong

Four assumptions that leave GRC programmes underdeveloped

Most GRC gaps aren't about missing effort — they're about risk that was never formally registered in the first place.

01 — VISIBILITY

“We track risk informally, and that's enough”

An informal risk list rarely survives a board or auditor request for a structured, prioritised, and owned risk register.

02 — SCOPE

“Our vendors are covered by their own security teams”

Third-party risk sits with you contractually and reputationally regardless of a vendor's own internal security posture.

03 — INSURANCE

“Our cyber insurance policy will cover a real incident”

Insurers verify represented controls at claim time — gaps between what was declared and what's actually implemented can directly affect a payout.

04 — RETENTION

“We keep data indefinitely just in case”

Undefined data retention is itself a growing regulatory and breach-exposure risk under DPDPA, not a neutral default.

What National Security Compliance covers

What's included, start to finish

A working GRC programme, not a one-time framework document.

01

Sector-specific obligation mapping

Identifying exactly which national security-related requirements apply to your organisation.

    See GRC Framework →
    02

    Data localisation assessment

    Whether and how data localisation requirements affect your architecture.

      See Cyber Risk Assessment →
      03

      Heightened incident reporting readiness

      Meeting the faster or more detailed reporting obligations these sectors often carry.

        See Third-Party Risk (TPRM) →
        04

        Security clearance & access control review

        Personnel and system access controls aligned to sector-specific expectations.

          See GRC Framework →
          05

          Legal-technical coordination

          Direct coordination with SIRI Law LLP's defence and government advisory practice.

            See Cyber Risk Assessment →

            Evidence, not guesswork

            No formal GRC vs. informal effort vs. a SIRI-supported programme

            The gap surfaces at renewal, at audit, or at claim time — exactly when it's most expensive to discover.

            ApproachNo formal programmeInformal / ad hocSIRI National Security Compliance
            Risk registerNoneInformal listStructured, owned, reviewed
            Third-party risk assessmentNoRareStandard
            Insurance-readiness verificationNoAssumedAssessed directly
            Regulatory alignment (RBI/SEBI/DPDPA)NoAssumedAssessed directly
            Board-level reporting cadenceNoIrregularRecurring

            Sources: RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; SEBI Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF); Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Summarised for comparison.

            Numbers every board should know

            What a GRC programme is actually protecting against

            62%

            Of cloud detections

            Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — often a third-party or vendor-access issue.

            6 HR

            CERT-In notification window

            Depends on risk visibility already existing before an incident starts the clock.

            29.44L

            Incidents CERT-In handled

            In the latest reporting year — the backdrop cyber insurance underwriting is increasingly priced against.

            70%

            Of malware detections

            Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).

            Why SIRI for National Security Compliance specifically

            GRC built by the team that also negotiates the fallout

            The same practice that builds your risk register and vendor assessments handles the regulatory and contractual fallout if a risk materialises.

            01

            Programmes built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead

            Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.

            02

            Financial-sector risk obligations covered directly

            Deepa Menon, Senior Associate, advises banks, NBFCs, and payment aggregators directly on RBI licensing, SEBI CSCRF, and financial-sector cyber resilience.

            03

            Findings connected directly to legal exposure

            SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.

            04

            Technical risk verified, not self-reported

            Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.

            Who this is built for

            Organisations this GRC service is built for

            Banks, NBFCs & insurers Organisations with significant vendor networks Companies renewing cyber insurance SEBI-regulated intermediaries Boards needing a defensible risk register

            How we work

            From scoping to ongoing delivery

            01

            Current-State Assessment

            We assess where you actually stand today, not against a generic template.

            Week 1
            02

            Framework & Process Design

            We design the specific process, register, or framework your organisation needs — sized to your risk, not oversized.

            Weeks 2–3
            03

            Implementation Support

            We help implement the process with your team, so it survives after we leave, not just on paper.

            Week 4+
            04

            Review & Continuous Improvement

            Periodic review keeps the programme current as your risk and regulatory landscape change.

            Ongoing

            Frequently asked

            National Security Compliance, answered directly

            Which sectors does this typically apply to?

            Critical infrastructure, defence and government-adjacent contractors, energy, and telecom most commonly — we confirm applicability during scoping.

            Is this handled confidentially?

            Yes — engagements in this category are handled under the same confidentiality and, where appropriate, privileged-engagement structure used for our legal work.

            How long does this take?

            Most GRC engagements in this category run 3 to 8 weeks depending on organisational size and current maturity.

            Who runs this day to day?

            A senior SIRI Security GRC consultant leads the engagement, with SIRI Law LLP input wherever a finding has legal or regulatory weight.

            Put risk on the record

            Scope National Security Compliance.

            Most engagements start with a current-state risk review before building out the full programme.

            Talk to SIRI Security: +91 79819 12046

            Visit or contact us

            SIRI Security — Hyderabad, India

            OfficeHITEC City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081, India
            Telephone+91 79819 12046
            Emailcontact@sirisecurity.com
            Other officesNew Delhi, India · Austin, Texas, USA · Online worldwide
            HoursMon–Sat, 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM IST · Emergency line 24/7
            Scroll to Top