Cloud Security Assessment — Most cloud breaches are misconfigurations, not zero-days
SIRI Security audits your AWS, Azure, or GCP environment against CIS Benchmarks and cloud-provider best practice, focused on the IAM, storage, and network misconfigurations that cause the overwhelming majority of real cloud breaches.
Testing evidence, not a scan report
What is a Cloud Security Assessment?
A cloud security assessment reviews how your cloud environment is actually configured — IAM roles and policies, storage bucket permissions, network security groups, logging and monitoring coverage, and encryption at rest and in transit — against CIS Benchmarks and the provider's own well-architected framework.
Unlike a penetration test, this is primarily a configuration review: we get read-only access to your cloud console or use infrastructure-as-code scans, and identify over-permissioned roles, publicly exposed storage, unencrypted data stores, and missing logging before an attacker finds them.
SIRI Security delivers Cloud Security Assessment to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave real exposure untested
A scanner report and a genuine security test are not the same evidence — and auditors increasingly know the difference.
“We ran an automated scan, so we're covered”
Automated tools catch known signatures; they consistently miss business-logic flaws and chained vulnerabilities a human tester finds by thinking like an attacker.
“Our last test covered the main system”
New features, integrations, and cloud services ship continuously — a test scoped a year ago doesn't speak to what's live today.
“We fixed the findings, so we're done”
Without a documented retest, there's no evidence the fix actually worked — which is exactly what an auditor or insurer will ask for.
“A clean report means we're secure”
A test result is a point-in-time statement about what was in scope — not a permanent guarantee, and not a substitute for ongoing monitoring.
What Cloud Security Assessment covers
What's included, start to finish
Deployed once per engagement, documented to a standard auditors and insurers actually accept.
IAM & permissions audit
Over-permissioned roles, unused credentials, and privilege escalation paths within your IAM structure.
Storage exposure review
S3/Blob/GCS buckets checked for public access, encryption, and versioning gaps.
Network security group audit
Overly permissive inbound/outbound rules and flat network architecture.
Logging & monitoring coverage
Whether CloudTrail/Activity Logs/Cloud Audit Logs are actually capturing what they need to.
CIS Benchmark scoring
A scored gap analysis against the relevant CIS Benchmark for your cloud provider.
Evidence, not guesswork
Unscoped internal effort vs. a documented SIRI engagement
The gap is rarely the tooling — it's whether the result holds up as evidence.
| Approach | No dedicated testing | Ad hoc internal effort | SIRI Cloud Security Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methodology | None | Varies by who ran it | OWASP / CREST-aligned, documented |
| Manual exploitation | No | Rare | Included as standard |
| Evidence for auditors/insurers | None | Inconsistent | Formal report + CVSS ratings |
| Retest on fixes | N/A | Rarely tracked | One free retest cycle included |
| Satisfies RBI/SEBI testing expectations | No | Partially | Yes, when scoped to your entity category |
Sources: RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; OWASP Top 10; DSCI and Seqrite 2026 threat data. Summarised for comparison; confirm current testing obligations applicable to your entity category.
Numbers every board should know
What testing is actually catching
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — the category testing has to explicitly cover.
Of malware detections
Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026) — the entry point most exploitation chains start from.
Incidents CERT-In handled
In the latest reporting year — the scale of activity testing exists to reduce a share of.
CERT-In notification window
Runs from discovery — tested, documented exposure is what makes that window realistic to meet.
Why SIRI for Cloud Security Assessment specifically
Testing connected directly to legal and response, not a separate vendor
The same roof runs the test, the fix verification, and — if a real finding turns into an incident — the legal response.
Findings connected directly to legal exposure
SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.
Led by named practitioners, not a rotating bench
Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.
Court-admissible evidence when it matters
Ananya Krishnan, SIRI's Digital Forensics Lead, prepares court-admissible forensic reports and testifies as an expert witness when findings end up in front of a judge.
Built for RBI and SEBI's specific evidentiary bar
Testing is scoped and documented to the standard RBI's 2026 Framework and SEBI's CSCRF expect from regulated entities, not a generic vendor template.
Who this is built for
Organisations this testing service is built for
How we work
From scoping to ongoing delivery
Scoping & Threat Modeling
We map the cloud environment attack surface with you, agree on rules of engagement, and build a threat model around what an attacker would actually go after first.
Week 1Manual + Automated Testing
Our testers combine automated scanning with hands-on manual exploitation against the cloud environment, since scanners alone miss business-logic and chained vulnerabilities.
Weeks 2–3Reporting & Risk Rating
Every finding is written up with proof-of-concept, CVSS scoring, and business impact — not just a raw scanner export — so your team can prioritise by risk, not by noise.
Week 4+Remediation & Free Retest
You fix the findings with our guidance, and we retest the fixed issues at no extra cost before issuing the final clearance report.
OngoingFrequently asked
Cloud Security Assessment, answered directly
Which cloud providers do you cover?
AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, including multi-cloud environments.
Do you need write access to our environment?
No — this is a read-only assessment. We never need write or delete permissions to identify misconfigurations.
How long does an engagement take?
Most single-application or single-network engagements run 5 to 10 business days depending on scope, with the report and retest typically following within another week.
Is this different from your Cloud Security Management service?
Yes — this is a point-in-time assessment; Cloud Security Management (under MSSP) is the ongoing, ticketed remediation and monitoring service that follows it.
Close the evidence gap
Scope Cloud Security Assessment.
Most engagements start with a short scoping call to confirm environment, timeline, and rules of engagement.
Related