SIRI Security — Exact Header + WhatsApp Widget (verbatim extract)
Military Grade Review | Elite Assessments — SIRI Security
Elite Assessments › Military Grade Review

Military Grade Review — An elevated assurance standard for environments where failure isn't an option

SIRI Security's Military Grade Review applies an elevated, defence-grade assurance standard for organisations whose environments demand a higher bar than standard commercial security testing.

62%Of cloud detections
70%Of malware detections
29.44LIncidents CERT-In handled
Why elite-tier assessment is now board-visible
Live tracking · scroll to see every relevant change
Growing gap
62% CLOUD
Cloud misconfiguration and IAM exploitation account for 62% of detections in cloud environments (DSCI) — exactly what an attacker's-POV assessment is designed to find first.
Baseline
70% MALWARE
Trojans and file infectors make up 70% of malware detections (Seqrite 2026) — a common finding once ransomware readiness is actually tested.
Effective
31 JUL 2026
RBI's 2026 Framework raises the bar on demonstrable resilience — elite-tier assessment is increasingly how regulated entities evidence it.
Baseline
6 HR WINDOW
CERT-In's notification window makes threat modelling and readiness testing a precondition for meeting the deadline once, not after, an incident starts.
Evidentiary standard
BSA 2023
Where an elite assessment surfaces material later relevant to a dispute, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 governs how that evidence is treated.

Tested at the standard a real adversary would use

What does a Military Grade Review involve?

Some environments — defence-adjacent, critical infrastructure, national-security-relevant, or simply operating under an internal risk appetite that demands it — need a more rigorous, exhaustive assurance standard than typical commercial VAPT.

This engagement applies a heightened testing standard: deeper manual testing depth, stricter evidentiary documentation, and assessment against defence-grade frameworks and threat models, executed by our most senior specialists.

Assume breach, then test the assumption
62% of cloud detections trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — the exact blind spot an attacker's-POV, military-grade assessment is built to surface before a real adversary does.

SIRI Security delivers Military Grade Review to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.

What organisations get wrong

Four assumptions elite-tier assessment exists to correct

Routine testing answers 'did we pass'; elite assessment answers 'could we actually survive this.'

01 — CONFIDENCE

“Our standard testing programme already covers this”

Elite-tier assessment goes further than routine testing by design — chaining findings the way a real, motivated adversary would, not stopping at the first clean scope boundary.

02 — READINESS

“We'd cope fine if ransomware hit us”

Ransomware readiness untested is ransomware readiness assumed — and 70% of malware detections are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026), the common precursor.

03 — THREAT MODEL

“Generic threat intelligence is specific enough”

A threat model built around your actual environment, assets, and adversary incentives finds what generic industry threat feeds miss.

04 — EVIDENCE

“The findings are just for our internal team”

Where an elite assessment surfaces something serious, the way it was documented matters if it ever needs to support a legal or insurance position.

What Military Grade Review covers

What's included, start to finish

Assessed the way a real, motivated adversary would approach it — not a generic checklist.

01

Elevated testing depth

Manual testing rigour beyond standard commercial VAPT scope.

    See Threat Modeling →
    02

    Nation-state-informed threat modeling

    Threats modeled against sophisticated, well-resourced adversary profiles.

      See Ransomware Readiness →
      03

      Strict evidentiary documentation

      Documentation standards suited to audit, legal, or regulatory scrutiny.

        See Threat & Vulnerability Management →
        04

        Senior specialist execution

        Delivered exclusively by our most experienced assessment team.

          See Threat Modeling →
          05

          Confidential handling protocols

          Engagement handled under strict confidentiality and need-to-know protocols.

            See Ransomware Readiness →

            Evidence, not guesswork

            Routine testing vs. self-assessed confidence vs. a SIRI elite assessment

            The difference shows up exactly when a real, sophisticated threat actually arrives.

            ApproachNo elite-tier assessmentSelf-assessed confidenceSIRI Military Grade Review
            Attacker's-POV methodologyNoNoIncluded
            Ransomware readiness testedNoAssumedVerified directly
            Custom threat modelNoGeneric feeds onlyBuilt for your environment
            Evidentiary documentationN/AInformalLitigation-ready where relevant
            Executive narrative reportingNoRareIncluded

            Sources: DSCI cloud detection data; Seqrite 2026 threat report; RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Summarised for comparison.

            Numbers every board should know

            What elite-tier assessment is actually catching

            62%

            Of cloud detections

            Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI).

            70%

            Of malware detections

            Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026) — the common ransomware precursor.

            29.44L

            Incidents CERT-In handled

            In the latest reporting year — the scale elite assessment work is measured against.

            6 HR

            CERT-In notification window

            The deadline a tested readiness posture is built to meet.

            Why SIRI for Military Grade Review specifically

            Assessed by the same team that runs real incident response

            The practitioners who run elite assessments are the same ones who contain real breaches — not a separate red-team vendor with no downstream accountability.

            01

            Led directly by SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity

            Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.

            02

            Court-admissible findings when it matters

            Ananya Krishnan, SIRI's Digital Forensics Lead, prepares court-admissible forensic reports and testifies as an expert witness when findings end up in front of a judge.

            03

            Findings connected directly to legal exposure

            SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.

            04

            Built for RBI's specific resilience bar

            Assessment scope and reporting are built to the standard RBI's 2026 Framework expects from regulated entities, not a generic red-team template.

            Who this is built for

            Organisations this elite assessment service is built for

            Banks & NBFCs High-profile or high-value targets Boards demanding an honest resilience view Organisations that have never tested ransomware readiness Enterprises facing a sophisticated or persistent threat

            How we work

            From scoping to ongoing delivery

            01

            Scoping & Rules of Engagement

            We define scope, objectives, and rules of engagement together, so the exercise targets what actually matters to your business.

            Week 1
            02

            Assessment Execution

            Our senior team executes the assessment, simulating realistic adversary behaviour rather than a generic scanner run.

            Weeks 2–3
            03

            Findings & Debrief

            We walk your team through findings in a live debrief, not just a written report dropped in an inbox.

            Week 4+
            04

            Remediation Roadmap

            A prioritised roadmap ties every finding to a concrete next step, ranked by actual risk.

            Ongoing

            Frequently asked

            Military Grade Review, answered directly

            Is this only for defence or government organisations?

            Primarily, but any organisation whose risk profile or client requirements demand an elevated assurance standard can request this engagement.

            Can this be delivered under NDA or on-site only?

            Yes — engagement terms including on-site-only delivery, NDA, and confidentiality protocols are scoped to your requirements.

            How long does this take?

            Most engagements in this category run 3 to 6 weeks depending on scope, with senior specialists involved throughout.

            Who on our side needs to be involved?

            We typically work with your security lead and relevant technical owners; for tabletop-style exercises, leadership involvement is part of the value.

            Test the assumption, not just the perimeter

            Scope Military Grade Review.

            Most engagements start with a short scoping call to agree objectives and rules of engagement.

            Talk to SIRI Security: +91 79819 12046

            Visit or contact us

            SIRI Security — Hyderabad, India

            OfficeHITEC City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081, India
            Telephone+91 79819 12046
            Emailcontact@sirisecurity.com
            Other officesNew Delhi, India · Austin, Texas, USA · Online worldwide
            HoursMon–Sat, 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM IST · Emergency line 24/7
            Scroll to Top