Secure Code Training — Training grounded in your own codebase's real findings
SIRI Security delivers secure code training for developers grounded in real vulnerability patterns — ideally drawn from your own codebase and past assessment findings, not generic slides.
Built for how people actually behave under pressure
What does Secure Code Training involve?
Generic secure coding training covering OWASP Top 10 in the abstract rarely changes how developers actually write code day to day. Training that's grounded in real examples from your own codebase and past findings is dramatically more effective.
We tailor training to your specific languages and frameworks, incorporate real (anonymised) findings from your own secure code reviews and VAPT engagements, and include hands-on exercises rather than lecture-only delivery.
SIRI Security delivers Secure Code Training to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave the human layer untested
Most human-layer risk isn't a knowledge gap — it's a gap between what people were told and how they behave under pressure.
“Annual training is enough”
A once-a-year session rarely changes behaviour under real pressure — ongoing, scenario-based reinforcement is what actually holds.
“We haven't needed a phishing simulation”
Without a live simulation, an organisation is guessing at its actual click-through rate, not measuring it.
“Security culture is IT's responsibility”
Leadership behaviour sets the tone for security culture far more than a training module — cybersecurity leadership work exists to make that explicit.
“Generic training satisfies our DPDPA obligations”
Training grounded specifically in your organisation's actual data-handling scenarios holds up better than generic, jurisdiction-agnostic content.
What Secure Code Training covers
What's included, start to finish
Training built around how your people actually work, reinforced with real testing.
Language & framework-specific content
Training tailored to the languages and frameworks your team actually uses.
Real findings integration
Anonymised examples drawn from your own past assessments where available.
Hands-on secure coding labs
Practical exercises, not lecture-only delivery.
Secure SDLC alignment
Training connected to the secure development lifecycle practices you're implementing.
Developer skill assessment
Baseline and post-training assessment to measure actual improvement.
Evidence, not guesswork
No training vs. annual checkbox training vs. a SIRI human-layer programme
The gap shows up the first time a real phishing attempt lands in an inbox.
| Approach | No training | Annual checkbox training | SIRI Secure Code Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live phishing simulation | No | Rare | Included |
| Scenario-based exercises | No | No | Included |
| DPDPA-specific content | No | Generic only | Grounded in your obligations |
| Leadership-level engagement | No | No | Included |
| Measured improvement over time | No | No | Tracked |
Sources: CERT-In annual incident data; Seqrite 2026 threat report; Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023; RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026. Summarised for comparison.
Numbers every board should know
What human-layer training is actually protecting against
Of malware detections
Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026), commonly delivered through a human-layer entry point.
Incidents CERT-In handled
In the latest reporting year — a scale where human error remains a leading factor.
CERT-In notification window
Depends on staff recognising and escalating an incident quickly.
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — often tied to human process gaps.
Why SIRI for Secure Code Training specifically
Training delivered jointly with the team that handles real incidents
Content is grounded in real legal obligations and real incident response experience, not a generic off-the-shelf course.
Content reviewed by SIRI's data protection legal team
Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.
Scenarios drawn from real incident response experience
Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.
Findings connected directly to legal exposure
SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.
Grounded in India's actual incident and breach data
Training scenarios reference CERT-In's real incident volume and Seqrite's current threat data, not generic international statistics.
Who this is built for
Organisations this human-layer service is built for
How we work
From scoping to ongoing delivery
Needs Assessment
We assess your organisation's current maturity and specific risk areas to tailor the program rather than deliver generic content.
Week 1Program Design
Content and delivery format are designed around your workforce, roles, and the risks most relevant to your industry.
Weeks 2–3Delivery & Engagement
The program is delivered — live, self-paced, or blended — with engagement tracked throughout, not assumed.
Week 4+Measurement & Iteration
We measure outcomes (not just completion) and iterate the program based on what's actually working.
OngoingFrequently asked
Secure Code Training, answered directly
Which languages and frameworks do you cover?
We tailor to your stack — commonly including Java, .NET, Python, JavaScript/Node, and mobile frameworks — scoped to what your team actually uses.
Is this useful alongside a Secure Code Review engagement?
Very much so — training is most effective when grounded in real findings from a recent Secure Code Review or DevSecOps engagement.
How long does a program cycle take?
Initial design and rollout typically take 3 to 6 weeks; most organisations then run this as a recurring annual or quarterly cycle.
Is the content generic or specific to us?
We tailor content to your actual risk profile, industry, and past incidents — generic content is a major reason security training programs fail to change behaviour.
Build a culture that holds under pressure
Scope Secure Code Training.
Most engagements start with a baseline simulation or assessment before designing the training programme.
Related