SIRI Security — Exact Header + WhatsApp Widget (verbatim extract)
Business Impact Analysis | Governance Layer — SIRI Security
Governance Layer › Business Impact Analysis

Business Impact Analysis — The foundation every continuity and recovery plan depends on

SIRI Security runs a structured Business Impact Analysis identifying which processes are genuinely critical, their dependencies, and how much downtime each can actually tolerate — the number every continuity and DR plan should be built from.

62%Of cloud detections
6 HRCERT-In notification window
29.44LIncidents CERT-In handled
Why governance is now a named board obligation
Live tracking · scroll to see every relevant change
Effective
31 JUL 2026
RBI's 2026 Framework requires board-level oversight of cyber resilience, not delegation to IT alone — governance-layer work exists to make that oversight substantive.
Named requirement
SEBI CSCRF
SEBI's framework names governance and reporting obligations for regulated intermediaries beyond technical controls alone.
Baseline
6 HR WINDOW
CERT-In's notification window depends on governance structures — defined roles and escalation paths — already being in place before an incident starts the clock.
Growing gap
62% CLOUD
Cloud misconfiguration and IAM exploitation account for 62% of detections in cloud environments (DSCI) — a governance and posture-management gap as much as a technical one.
Named requirement
DPDPA
India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act expects demonstrable data governance, not just a written policy.

Governance the board can actually act on

What is a Business Impact Analysis?

A Business Impact Analysis (BIA) systematically identifies your organisation's critical business processes, the systems and people they depend on, and the maximum tolerable downtime and data loss for each — the foundational input for continuity planning, disaster recovery, and resilience work.

Done properly, a BIA often surprises leadership — processes assumed to be critical turn out to tolerate more downtime than expected, while some genuinely critical dependencies were never on anyone's radar until they were mapped explicitly.

Maturity is measured, not assumed
62% of cloud detections trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — the class of gap a structured maturity or posture assessment is built to surface before the board is asked to sign off on resilience.

SIRI Security delivers Business Impact Analysis to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.

What organisations get wrong

Four assumptions that leave governance underdeveloped

Governance gaps rarely show up until a board is asked a direct question it can't answer.

01 — OVERSIGHT

“IT owns cyber risk, not the board”

RBI's 2026 Framework and SEBI's CSCRF both expect board-level oversight of cyber resilience directly, not a delegated report nobody reads.

02 — MEASUREMENT

“We feel reasonably mature”

Maturity assessed informally rarely survives a structured review — a scored assessment is what turns a feeling into a defensible position.

03 — PLANNING

“Our BCP/DR plan exists, so we're covered”

An untested BCP/DR plan is a document, not a capability — governance work exists to confirm it actually holds up under a real scenario.

04 — DATA

“Our data governance policy covers our DPDPA obligations”

A policy alone doesn't demonstrate the data mapping, retention discipline, and access governance DPDPA increasingly expects to see evidenced.

What Business Impact Analysis covers

What's included, start to finish

A structured programme the board can actually engage with, not a technical report handed up unread.

01

Process criticality mapping

Which business processes actually matter most, ranked objectively rather than by department loudness.

    See Data Governance →
    02

    Dependency identification

    Systems, people, vendors, and data each critical process actually depends on.

      See Security Posture Management →
      03

      Maximum tolerable downtime scoring

      A realistic, agreed downtime tolerance for each critical process.

        See Cybersecurity Maturity →
        04

        Financial & operational impact quantification

        What an outage of each process actually costs, in terms leadership understands.

          See Data Governance →
          05

          BIA report & recommendations

          A structured report that feeds directly into BCP/DR planning and resilience work.

            See Security Posture Management →

            Evidence, not guesswork

            No formal governance vs. informal effort vs. a SIRI-supported programme

            The gap surfaces exactly when a board or regulator asks for a substantive answer.

            ApproachNo formal programmeInformal / ad hocSIRI Business Impact Analysis
            Board-level reportingNoneOccasionalStructured, recurring
            Scored maturity baselineNoNoIncluded
            BCP/DR testingNoRareScheduled
            Regulatory alignment (RBI/SEBI)NoAssumedAssessed directly
            Roadmap with prioritisationNoInformalIncluded

            Sources: RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; SEBI Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF); Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023; DSCI cloud detection data. Summarised for comparison.

            Numbers every board should know

            What governance work is actually protecting against

            62%

            Of cloud detections

            Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — a posture and governance gap as much as a technical one.

            6 HR

            CERT-In notification window

            Depends on governance structures already being in place before an incident starts the clock.

            29.44L

            Incidents CERT-In handled

            In the latest reporting year — the scale governance programmes are measured against.

            70%

            Of malware detections

            Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).

            Why SIRI for Business Impact Analysis specifically

            Governance built by the team that also answers to regulators

            The same practice that builds your governance layer files your regulatory filings when a real incident tests it.

            01

            Programmes built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead

            Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.

            02

            Financial-sector governance covered directly

            Deepa Menon, Senior Associate, advises banks, NBFCs, and payment aggregators directly on RBI licensing, SEBI CSCRF, and financial-sector cyber resilience.

            03

            Findings connected directly to legal exposure

            SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.

            04

            Technical maturity verified, not self-reported

            Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.

            Who this is built for

            Organisations this governance service is built for

            Banks, NBFCs & insurers Boards preparing a resilience report Organisations scaling past informal governance Acquirers running security due diligence SEBI-regulated intermediaries

            How we work

            From scoping to ongoing delivery

            01

            Current-State Assessment

            We assess where you stand today against the specific outcome this service is meant to achieve.

            Week 1
            02

            Programme Design

            We design the specific programme, policy, or plan your organisation needs, sized appropriately for you.

            Weeks 2–3
            03

            Implementation Support

            We help implement alongside your team so the programme survives and runs after we leave.

            Week 4+
            04

            Review & Continuous Improvement

            A review cadence keeps it current as your organisation and risk landscape change.

            Ongoing

            Frequently asked

            Business Impact Analysis, answered directly

            Is this a standalone deliverable or part of a bigger programme?

            It can be standalone, but it's most valuable as the foundation for our BCP/DR Planning or Cyber Resilience engagements.

            How do you gather this information?

            Structured interviews and workshops with process owners across the business, not just IT.

            How long does this take?

            Most engagements in this category run 3 to 8 weeks depending on organisational size and current maturity.

            Who runs this day to day?

            A senior SIRI Security governance consultant leads the engagement, coordinating with SIRI Law LLP wherever legal or regulatory interpretation is needed.

            Give the board a real answer

            Scope Business Impact Analysis.

            Most engagements start with a scored baseline assessment before recommending a governance roadmap.

            Talk to SIRI Security: +91 79819 12046

            Visit or contact us

            SIRI Security — Hyderabad, India

            OfficeHITEC City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081, India
            Telephone+91 79819 12046
            Emailcontact@sirisecurity.com
            Other officesNew Delhi, India · Austin, Texas, USA · Online worldwide
            HoursMon–Sat, 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM IST · Emergency line 24/7
            Scroll to Top