Cybersecurity Insurance — Get better terms, and make sure a claim actually pays out
SIRI Security assesses your security posture against what cyber insurance underwriters actually look for — and, just as importantly, what could get a claim denied after an incident.
Risk management the board can act on, not a spreadsheet nobody updates
What does Cybersecurity Insurance readiness involve?
Cyber insurance underwriting increasingly depends on specific, verifiable security controls — MFA coverage, backup isolation, endpoint detection — and policies increasingly include exclusions that trigger if those controls turn out not to be in place at the time of a claim.
We assess your posture against what underwriters actually ask about, close the gaps that most affect premium and terms, and — critically — make sure the controls you've represented on your application are genuinely in place, so a claim doesn't get denied on a technicality after a real incident.
SIRI Security delivers Cybersecurity Insurance to this standard directly — practitioner-led, documented, and connected to SIRI Law LLP's legal and regulatory response if a finding ever needs to go further.
What organisations get wrong
Four assumptions that leave GRC programmes underdeveloped
Most GRC gaps aren't about missing effort — they're about risk that was never formally registered in the first place.
“We track risk informally, and that's enough”
An informal risk list rarely survives a board or auditor request for a structured, prioritised, and owned risk register.
“Our vendors are covered by their own security teams”
Third-party risk sits with you contractually and reputationally regardless of a vendor's own internal security posture.
“Our cyber insurance policy will cover a real incident”
Insurers verify represented controls at claim time — gaps between what was declared and what's actually implemented can directly affect a payout.
“We keep data indefinitely just in case”
Undefined data retention is itself a growing regulatory and breach-exposure risk under DPDPA, not a neutral default.
What Cybersecurity Insurance covers
What's included, start to finish
A working GRC programme, not a one-time framework document.
Underwriting questionnaire gap assessment
Your actual posture checked against what standard cyber insurance applications ask.
Control verification
Confirming controls represented on your application are genuinely implemented, not just assumed.
Premium & terms improvement roadmap
Which specific gaps, if closed, most improve your underwriting position.
Exclusion risk review
Policy exclusions that could trigger based on gaps in your actual posture.
Renewal support
Re-assessment ahead of each renewal cycle as underwriting requirements evolve.
Evidence, not guesswork
No formal GRC vs. informal effort vs. a SIRI-supported programme
The gap surfaces at renewal, at audit, or at claim time — exactly when it's most expensive to discover.
| Approach | No formal programme | Informal / ad hoc | SIRI Cybersecurity Insurance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk register | None | Informal list | Structured, owned, reviewed |
| Third-party risk assessment | No | Rare | Standard |
| Insurance-readiness verification | No | Assumed | Assessed directly |
| Regulatory alignment (RBI/SEBI/DPDPA) | No | Assumed | Assessed directly |
| Board-level reporting cadence | No | Irregular | Recurring |
Sources: RBI (Commercial Banks — Cybersecurity, Technology: Risk, Resilience and Assurance Framework) Directions, 2026; SEBI Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF); Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Summarised for comparison.
Numbers every board should know
What a GRC programme is actually protecting against
Of cloud detections
Trace to misconfiguration and IAM exploitation (DSCI) — often a third-party or vendor-access issue.
CERT-In notification window
Depends on risk visibility already existing before an incident starts the clock.
Incidents CERT-In handled
In the latest reporting year — the backdrop cyber insurance underwriting is increasingly priced against.
Of malware detections
Are trojans and file infectors (Seqrite 2026).
Why SIRI for Cybersecurity Insurance specifically
GRC built by the team that also negotiates the fallout
The same practice that builds your risk register and vendor assessments handles the regulatory and contractual fallout if a risk materialises.
Programmes built by SIRI's GRC and Compliance lead
Sneha Iyer, Associate Partner and Head of GRC and Compliance, has delivered ISO 27001, SOC 2, and SEBI CSCRF programmes across the client base this catalogue serves.
Financial-sector risk obligations covered directly
Deepa Menon, Senior Associate, advises banks, NBFCs, and payment aggregators directly on RBI licensing, SEBI CSCRF, and financial-sector cyber resilience.
Findings connected directly to legal exposure
SIRI Security runs under the same roof as SIRI Law LLP — when a finding carries real legal exposure, the engagement can be brought under attorney-client privilege from day one, not bolted on after the fact.
Technical risk verified, not self-reported
Vikram Rao, SIRI's Head of Cybersecurity, directs offensive security and incident response and leads CERT-In breach containment for enterprise clients.
Who this is built for
Organisations this GRC service is built for
How we work
From scoping to ongoing delivery
Current-State Assessment
We assess where you actually stand today, not against a generic template.
Week 1Framework & Process Design
We design the specific process, register, or framework your organisation needs — sized to your risk, not oversized.
Weeks 2–3Implementation Support
We help implement the process with your team, so it survives after we leave, not just on paper.
Week 4+Review & Continuous Improvement
Periodic review keeps the programme current as your risk and regulatory landscape change.
OngoingFrequently asked
Cybersecurity Insurance, answered directly
Can you help us get a lower premium?
We can't set your premium, but closing the specific gaps underwriters weight most heavily commonly does improve terms — and more importantly, protects your ability to actually collect on a claim.
Do you review our policy wording itself?
SIRI Law LLP can review policy wording and exclusions directly; this service focuses on the security posture side of the equation.
How long does this take?
Most GRC engagements in this category run 3 to 8 weeks depending on organisational size and current maturity.
Who runs this day to day?
A senior SIRI Security GRC consultant leads the engagement, with SIRI Law LLP input wherever a finding has legal or regulatory weight.
Put risk on the record
Scope Cybersecurity Insurance.
Most engagements start with a current-state risk review before building out the full programme.
Related